Michelle Malkin: DON'T FORGET CONNER
Michelle has an interesting piece about the Peterson case. I posted a few thoughts on that case earlier, but something she points out in her article really jumped out at me.
When talking about 31 states that have protections for unborn victims and the new federal law known as the "Laci and Conner law" she makes the following observation:
the Federal Unborn Victims of Violence Act, also known as Laci and Conner's Law, was signed into law by President Bush earlier this year. Planned Parenthood and other pro-choice groups opposed the legislation.
How can you openly oppose a law that makes it a crime to attack a women and kill her unborn child? Where is the right to choose there? Are we to suppose the woman was going to have an abortion anyway so no harm, no foul?